Note about colors
        
            - Red is generally associated with longer prosecution and/or harder-to-obtain allowances.
 
            - Green is generally associated with shorter prosecution and/or easier-to-obtain allowances.
 
            - Gold is generally associated with more-experienced examiners.
 
            - Blue is generally associated with less-experienced examiners.
 
        
        
            Thus, a lot of red and gold means an experienced, "difficult" examiner.
            A lot of green and gold is an experienced, "easy" examiner.
            A lot of blue means an inexperienced examiner (and thus higher expected variance in her metrics).
        
        Basic Stats
        Allowance Rate
        
            Applications allowed / (applications allowed + applications abandoned)
            To get a better sense of applications that were abandoned on the merits, abandonments during preexam are ignored and abandonments for failure
            to pay issue fee are treated as allowances. Based on applications disposed in the last three years.
        
        Actions per Allowance
        
            (Non-final rejections + final rejections + examiner answers + restrictions + Ex-Parte Quayle actions) / Applications allowed
            Based on applications disposed in the last three years.
        
        Months to First Action
        
            Number of months from filing or 371 date until the first non-final rejection, final rejection, or allowance. Based on applications disposed in the last three years.
            Based on applications disposed in the last three years.
        
        Months to First Allowance
        
            Number of months from filing or 371 date until the first allowance. Time to first allowance better reflects
            the portion of the timeline that is in the examiner's control. (e.g., it ignores delays in paying the issue
            fee and delays resulting from the filing of RCEs with IDSs after allowance). Based on applications disposed in the last three years.
        
        Appeal Stats
        PTAB Affirmance Rate
        
            Percentage of PTAB decisions in which the examiner was completely affirmed. Affirmed-in-part is not counted as an affirmance.
        
        PTAB Decisions
        
            Number PTAB decisions in the past three years.
        
        After-Final Response Outcomes
        RCE
        
            Percentage of after-final responses which were followed by an RCE
        
        Appeal Brief
        
            Percentage of after-final responses which were followed by an Appeal Brief
        
        Appeal Brief
        
            Percentage of after-final responses which received an allowance without an intervening RCE or an Appeal Brief
        
        Reopen
        
            Percentage of after-final responses which received a new office action without an intervening RCE or an Appeal Brief.
        
        AFCP 2.0 Outcomes
        
            Same as for After-Final Response Outcomes, except limited to the after-final responses which were accompanied
            by a request for consideration under the after-final consideration pilot program.
        
        Pre-Appeal Request Outcomes
        Proceed to Board
        
            The percentage of pre-appeal requests that were met with a decision of "proceed to board." Other requests resulted either in re-opening
            of prosecution or an allowance.
        
        Appeal Brief Outcomes
        Nonfinal or Final Rejection
        
            The percentage of appeal briefs which resulted in the examiner reopening prosecution, without an intervening RCE.
        
        Examiner Answer or Board Decision
        
            The percentage of appeal briefs which the examiner answered or (in the come cases) went straight to a board decision without an examiner answer.
        
        Allowance
        
            The percentage of appeal briefs which resulted in an allowance without an intervening office action, appeal brief, or RCE.
        
        Defective
        
            The percentage of appeal briefs which were determined to be defective.
        
        Examiner-Initiated Interviews
        Allowance Rate With
        
            Allowed Applications with at least one examiner-initiated interview / (All Disposed Applications with at least one examiner-initiated interview)
        
        Number of Interviews
        
            Number of examiner-initiated interviews in the past three years
        
        Actions per Interview
        
            Number of actions in applications with at least one examiner-initiated interview / Number of one examiner-initiated interviews
        
        Applicant-Initiated Interviews
        Allowance Rate With
        
            Allowed Applications with at least one applicant-initiated interview / (All Disposed Applications with at least one applicant-initiated interview)
        
        Number of Interviews
        
            Number of applicant-initiated interviews in the past three years
        
        Actions per Interview
        
            Number of actions in applications with at least one applicant-initiated interview / Number of one applicant-initiated interviews
        
        Experience
        Nonfinal Rejections
        
            Total number of nonfinal rejections the examiner has mailed.
        
        Final Rejections
        
            Total number of final rejections the examiner has mailed.
        
        Restrictions
        
            Total number of restrictions the examiner has mailed.
        
        Examiner Answers
        
            Total number of examiner answers the examiner has mailed.
        
        Ex Parte Quayle
        
            Total number of nonfinal rejections the examiner has mailed.